Skip to main content
 

Thousands Petition Blizzard For StarCraft LAN
 Gunnar Petzall 

Many StarCraft II fans are upset over Blizzard's decision to exclude a local area network (LAN) game mode.

Yesterday we reported that Blizzard has confirmed "no LAN mode" in StarCraft II, and the news spread quickly over the net. In just a day over 2,500 (update 01/07/2008: over 21.000 signed) have signed a petition asking Blizzard to consider including network multiplayer in addition to Battle.net in the game, with the number growing by the minute.

Blizzard stated the decision to exclude LAN play "is because of the planned technology to be incorporated into Battle.net," a topic it will reveal more about at a later date. The company apparently want players to come together in one single place.  For most fans it will not change the issue of not being able to connect without an internet connection, however.

IncGamers contacted Christian Sørensen, the apparent creator of the petition, who revealed he isn't the original author. It's a collective effort from a small group of fans on the StarCraft community site StarcraftWire.net.

However, some StarCraft fans oppose the petition, citing concerns about piracy.

"I don't see a reason why it'll decrease or increase it," Sørensen said, "Pirates will always be there. [Excluding LAN mode] will only punish the people who are legit buyers."

Michael Frost, one of the fans signing the petition, said "no LAN will encourge B.net emulation, not stop it."

Services like ICCUP emulate Battle.net, and provide alternatives to Blizzard's own. Rob Pardo of Blizzard called it a pirate server, and it's something the company will likely deal with after the launch of StarCraft II.

Sørensen and many others argue LAN is great for users with a poor internet connection and players who don't want to connect to the internet at all. Salie Hendricks, another fan signing the petition, gave an example: "Africans only have LAN. You will lose out to piracy."

The company has been beseeched by fans before. Last year, 50,000 Diablo III fans implored Blizzard to change the colour scheme of their favourite game to be more dark and bloody and, in November, StarCraft fans requested that Blizzard keep the original voice actors for the sequel. Both of these requests have since been partially addressed by Blizzard.

We will continue to report on the petition. Stay tuned for more info.

N4G : News for Gamers

Related Info

StarCraft 2

User comments

(1) Posted: 14:20 on 30 Jun 2009
Kwhite
I normally see better articles than this but ultimately it's just writing for the sake of a story. When I saw a source quoted for something as short sighted as "Africans only have LAN. You will lose out to piracy" then I know this story is grasping at straws.

The petition site does not restrict based on IP I see, so it looks like it could be just a 100 fans spamming the buttons over a day to get an ego trip. When the game will be selling millions that's a drop in the hat.

After reading this article, I'm feeling more understanding for blizzard. This just sounds like a ploy of teenagers or young college kids who watch starcraft on youtube who wish to pirate it themselves and lashing out.

Piracy will always be there, companies base their returns on it and the one company who has done the most to reduce piracy is Valve with Steam. Sounds like blizzard is taking a page out of their book and will reap the rewards of less piracy. I'd trust their judgement more than the judgement of kids who naively say "Africans only have LAN"...

The final examples of how blizzard caved in on the change of the colour scheme or keep the voice actors is stupid support as well. In both those cases it was obvious that they would make the changes on their own. Two more cases of people who have no hand in the development taking credit for choices of a company they had no hand in assisting.

It's fans like this that make my palm hit my forehead.
(2) Posted: 17:33 on 30 Jun 2009
Gunnar Petzall
It's not the first or the last time with the listening to fans though. They have done the same way with WoW patches dozens of times. They start out saying they can't or won't, and then sneakily-like adds it later when they think people are no longer watching. just because they want people to think like you: "they would have done it anyway".

Look at any torrent site, just how did you say Steam had lessened it? Only hardcore pirates play on hamachi anyway, disconnected from ladders and stats, if anything, ICCUP and emulator servers are the problem, something that more than likely will increase rather than increase with lessened personal freedom in a game.

As for the quotes, they are just two random ones out of now 3600~

However, you might be right though... Perhaps it's time to realise internet isn't the open and friendly place it once was...
(3) Posted: 20:32 on 30 Jun 2009
idleboy
The first two petitions i find pointless, colour scheme or voice actors dont make that much of a difference to me, but this petition for LAN play i hope Blizzard keeps an eye on and changes their mind on the matter. If there is no LAN multiplayer in StarCraft 2 then i most likely wont be able to play it at my university, because i am pretty sure they are going to use more ports than is required for browsing the internet, and my university pretty much blocks all ports but those needed for browsing...
please register or login to comment.
gamesbasesment PCGamestore.com

Popular Stories This Hour

Latest Comments

Game Releases

Most...