or login with

EA wins the Mass Effect 3 ending investigation farce

13 Jun 2012  by   John Robertson
Tweet about this on Twitter1Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0

EA has won in the investigation into the advertising campaign for Mass Effect 3. 

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) decided to carry out the investigation following complaints from some players that the amount of influence they would have over the game’s ending had been exaggerated. If you’ve read anything that I’ve written on this subject before, you’ll know that I consider the complaint idiotic and that anyone with the slightest ability to understand narrative and character would be able to read that endings were indeed different.

ASA’s investigation centred around a Mass Effect 3 advert that carried the phrase “decisions you make completely shape your experience and outcome”, the majority of complaints centred on the idea that the game’s endings were too similar to one another. In a victory for sanity, the ASA has found in favour of EA.

The ASA statement reads:

“The ASA acknowledged the belief that players’ choices in the game did not influence the outcome to the extent claimed by EA.

“However, we considered that the three choices at the end of the game were thematically quite different, and that the availability and effectiveness of those choices would be directly determined by a player’s score, which was calculated with reference to previous performance in the game(s).

“We also acknowledged that there appeared to be a large number of minor variations in the end stages of Mass Effect 3, and that those were directly impacted by choices made by players earlier in the game(s).

“Whilst we acknowledged that the advertiser had placed particular emphasis on the role that player choices would play in determining the outcome of the game, we considered that most consumers would realise there would be a finite number of possible outcomes within the game and, because we considered that the advertiser had shown that players’ previous choices and performance would impact on the ending of the game, we concluded that the ad was not misleading.”

Tweet about this on Twitter1Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0

Related to this story

Have you got all our top PC game picks in your Steam library? Follow the IncGamers Curator list.
Register an IncGamers account to post comments, enter giveways and more!
You can also post through a social network or without logging in.
    
or login with
  1. +1

    A) EA has yet again put their hands into another companies’ pocket, nothing new.
    B) “However, we considered that the three choices at the end of the game were thematically quite different, and that the availability and effectiveness of those choices would be directly determined by a player’s score, which was calculated with reference to previous performance in the game(s).

    –False, Each ending had very little variation. “previous performance in the game(s)” [suggesting that ME1 & 2 impacted ME3's ending] Only refers to which characters are in the final moments of the game. That’s hardly “quite different”. You could play ME2, get the best ending possible, but still get the same ending as someone who did not import a character into ME3…based on a “score”. The endings did nothing for the fans to make them feel their choices throughout the series impacted the outcome. It literally contradicts what the entire series was built upon.

    C) Ironic that you would call people unsatisfied with the ending “idiotic” when you yourself sound like an uneducated idiot. It’s clear you don’t quite grasp WHY fans are upset. So I will do you a favor, watch the following links.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4H_A7SeawU4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MlatxLP-xs

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6TmTv6deTI

    After your enlightenment, understand that almost all fans feel this way. It isn’t because we “didn’t get it” or “didn’t understand”. The endings had minimum variation.

    Perhaps the gaming community would take your journalism a bit more seriously if you weren’t so quick to toss childish insults about.

    June 13, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    1. LongerBetterWinner
      +1

      a journalist making a comment designed to flame comments and arguments… what’s new

      June 13, 2012 at 5:08 pm

  2. ralok
    +1

    what are you talking about the effect is the exact same, as is the video that plays demonstrating the effect.

    June 13, 2012 at 8:02 pm

You're too late! The comments are now closed.

Game advertisements by <a href="http://www.game-advertising-online.com" target="_blank">Game Advertising Online</a> require iframes.